From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji? |
Date: | 2007-05-14 08:05:15 |
Message-ID: | 4648183B.7080208@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Not to my knowledge, but I have no method of testing what's going on,
> and I hate guessing like this - in fact this is what has worried me all
> along about supporting MSVC builds - we always said we didn't want to
> have to have 2 build environments, but now we have two and we'll be
> supporting them forever, even though one of them is not used by 95% of
> our developers. I realise that MSVC builds are likely to perform better,
> but we have now got a situation where we are likely to have breakage on
> a regular basis, ISTM.
It's not just that they perform better - we also get a debugger that
actually works well (yes, I know newer gdb's apparently do work on
Mingw; but even a fully functional GDB doesn't come close to VC++), but
more importantly it's looking more and more like it'll be our only way
of producing a 64bit build for Windows.
> (sorry to grumble - it's been a very frustrating 24 hours)
:-(
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-05-14 08:16:15 | Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2007-05-14 03:58:14 | Concurrently updating an updatable view |