Re: Current enums patch

From: Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Current enums patch
Date: 2007-04-02 19:21:20
Message-ID: 461157B0.7050904@tomd.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> While all this reasoning is perfectly OK on its own terms, it ignores
> the precedents of SQL identifier handling. Maybe we should revisit the
> question of whether the labels are identifiers.

Implying that they shouldn't be quoted like text (or should be
double-quoted if required)? Originally when discussing the patch I
thought that this was a good idea, but now I'm not so sure. How does one
set an enum value from e.g. a JDBC PreparedStatement in that scenario?

Cheers

Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2007-04-02 19:21:31 Re: Blocked post
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-04-02 19:16:59 Re: Current enums patch