Re: tsearch_core for inclusion

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: tsearch_core for inclusion
Date: 2007-03-16 03:16:52
Message-ID: 45FA0C24.3080108@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>> And is there some another objections?
>
> Most people whom I talk to about tsearch who want the syntax changed to make
> it easier want something akin to just "CREATE INDEX fti1 on t1(c1) USING
> FULLTEXT" and then be done with it. This patch isn't going to give people
> that.

+1 (again) Although I would see something like this:

CREATE INDEX fti1 on t1(c1) USING FULLTEXT [WITH] GIST | GIN

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-16 03:29:24 Re: tsearch_core for inclusion
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-16 03:16:10 Re: As proposed the complete changes to pg_trigger and pg_rewrite