Re: [PATCHES] Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum
Date: 2007-03-05 19:30:00
Message-ID: 45EC6FB8.8090603@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-performance

Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> There could be a GUC vacuum_freeze_limit, and the actual FreezeLimit
> would be calculated as
> GetOldestXmin() - vacuum_freeze_limit

We already have that. It's called vacuum_freeze_min_age, and the default
is 100 million transactions.

IIRC we added it late in the 8.2 release cycle when we changed the clog
truncation point to depend on freeze limit.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-03-05 19:32:55 My time off
Previous Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-03-05 19:26:58 Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-05 19:31:07 Re: Heap page diagnostic/test functions (WIP)
Previous Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-03-05 19:26:58 Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-03-05 19:41:40 Re: [PATCHES] Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum
Previous Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-03-05 19:26:58 Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum