From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrej Ricnik-Bay <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Brandon Aiken <BAiken(at)winemantech(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql) |
Date: | 2007-02-23 02:50:18 |
Message-ID: | 45DE566A.3060909@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake escribió:
>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Joshua D. Drake escribió:
>>>> Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote:
>>>>> On 2/23/07, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>>> That depends greatly on what you're doing with it. Generally, as soon
>>>>>> as you start throwing a multi-user workload at it, MySQL stops
>>>>>> scaling. http://tweakers.net recently did a study on that.
>>>>> I think I recall that wikipedia uses MySQL ... they get quite a few
>>>>> hits, too, I believe.
>>>> And outages if you watch :)
>>> Does this mean that we believe the Wikipedia would not suffer any
>>> outages if it ran on Postgres?
>> I believe it would suffer less outage yes.
>
> And how is SourceForge doing these days, by the way?
Wonderful of course :)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrej Ricnik-Bay | 2007-02-23 03:42:02 | Re: postgresql vs mysql |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-02-23 02:46:07 | Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql) |