Re: php professional

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: php professional
Date: 2007-02-22 17:40:43
Message-ID: 45DDD59B.6040904@cox.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/22/07 10:40, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Well no. PHP is not a professional language because it has no really
>>> design - and that has nothing to do with the fact it beeing a scripting
>>> language. Its a bad scripting language. (Say namespaces for example,
>>> confusing function interfaces, unicode flaws, missing usable frameworks,
>>> silly type handling, quoting hell)
>> - What do you mean by confusing function interfaces and unicode flaws?
>
>
> This whole discussion is about a language lawyer and a professional. The
> reality is, professional programmers do use PHP. I would say probably
> more than any other language out there.

This is what I get for writing an email at 4AM after dying at the
top of Sokoban. Sooo close to the treasure room!

Anyway...

Personal Home Page Tools was designed to personal home pages in the
low-threat environment of 1995, the same year as MySQL.

Whereas some languages and RDBMSs have a firm design philosophy,
both PHP & MySQL were built as personal/small-systems tools, and
then wildly expanded. Current design, security & feature issues
bear out that there's a lot of ad hocery in both systems.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF3dWbS9HxQb37XmcRAmZOAKDcricsMJl3SUrfJ/s6yzAzIOOCeQCgwcLX
bmxwfTonJ5xZOBSkknR03Po=
=6mAB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chad Wagner 2007-02-22 17:49:16 Re: postgresql vs mysql
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-02-22 17:30:00 Re: php professional