Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: nikolay(at)samokhvalov(dot)com
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib
Date: 2007-02-06 18:30:51
Message-ID: 45C8C95B.7070905@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
> On 2/5/07, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> [...]
>> I would suggest we start with what is (I think) simplest and clearest:
>>
>> . catalog support via a simple extension->schema(s) map
>> . initdb installs standard extensions if it finds them, unless told
>> not to
>> . support for adjusting search path.
>
> Why adjusting search_path is needed at all?
>

If the extension installs everything in dedicated namespace(s), I think
we would want to have an option to add those namespaces easily to search
paths. Right now all we can do is to set a search path. It would be
nice, for example, to have support for appending or prepending something
to the search path.

I suspect most apps/extensions don't currently use namespaces much, or
we might well have seen more demand in this area.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2007-02-06 18:33:40 Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-02-06 18:27:47 Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto