Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Oisin Glynn <me(at)oisinglynn(dot)com> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Anyway I think that a fair case could be made for dropping the 8.0
>>> branch now, and maybe 8.1 too, as far as Windows support goes.
>
>> My 8.2c,
>> Having 8.1 end of life this soon after the release of 8.2 seems pretty
>> harsh.
>
> That's fine, I just wanted to run that idea up the flagpole and see if
> anyone would salute. The important point is that no one has spoken
> against retiring 8.0-on-Windows now. (Don't tell me people actually
> listened to us when we said not to run production with it ;-))

They didn't, but those of us they call quickly made them upgrade ;)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/