| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Date: | 2007-01-24 19:58:35 |
| Message-ID: | 45B7BA6B.2010909@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Jeremy Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> I still haven't heard any argument for why this would be necessary or
>> desirable at all, other than that it looks better for marketing
>> reasons, which I will counter by saying that it looks worse for
>> marketing reasons because our hailed plugin mechanism is apparently so
>> poor that it can't support some practical extension module such as
>> this.
>>
>
> I for one am greatly looking forward to tsearch2 being in core.
>
>
For goodness' sake! This is work that's been sponsored! Are we going to
turn around now and reject it? We'd be a laughing stock.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-01-24 20:13:14 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2007-01-24 19:57:01 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-01-24 20:13:14 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2007-01-24 19:57:01 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |