| From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Autovacuum Improvements |
| Date: | 2007-01-09 16:31:59 |
| Message-ID: | 45A3C37F.7080102@zeut.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Csaba Nagy wrote:
> Other thing, how will the vacuum queue be populated ? Or the "queue" here means nothing, all workers will always go through all tables to pick one based on their own criteria ? My concern here is that the current way of checking 1 DB per minute is not going to work with category #2 tables, they really have to be vacuumed continuously sometimes.
Without getting into all the details, the autovacuum naptime is a GUC
variable right now, so it can be much more frequent than the current
default which is 60 seconds.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-09 16:33:29 | Re: SELECT INTO using Views? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-09 16:31:20 | Re: Operator performance question |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Csaba Nagy | 2007-01-09 16:36:20 | Re: Autovacuum Improvements |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-01-09 16:27:20 | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #2873: Function that returns an empty set |