Re: hstore improvements?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: hstore improvements?
Date: 2009-03-13 20:06:48
Message-ID: 4595.1236974808@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Optionally compressing the values would be nice ...
>>
>> The whole Datum will be toasted/compressed if it gets large enough. Is
>> that not enough?

> It doesn't always gets large enough, and there's no way to control that.

Maybe not, but putting compression into a datatype is NOT NOT NOT the
answer. You only want one layer of compression in a system, and that
means if you want more control you need to speak to the TOAST code.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-03-13 20:12:04 Re: hstore improvements?
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2009-03-13 19:34:50 Re: hstore improvements?