Re: Autovacuum Improvements

From: Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
To: Matthew O'Connor <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com>, Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autovacuum Improvements
Date: 2006-12-19 21:57:13
Message-ID: 45886039.7020400@myemma.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Matthew O'Connor wrote:
> Glen Parker wrote:
>> If it isn't there somewhere already, I would ask to add:
>> Expose a very easy way to discover autovacuum's opinion about a
>> particular table, for example "table_needs_vacuum(oid)", ignoring any
>> time constraints that may be in place.
>
> This might be a nice feature however in the presence of the much
> talked about but not yet developed maintenance window concept, I'm not
> sure how this should work. That is, during business hours the table
> doesn't need vacuuming, but it will when the evening maintenance
> window opens up.
Well, what he's saying is, "Not taking into account any time/maintenance
windows, does this table need vacuuming?"

--
erik jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
software development
emma(r)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-19 21:57:24 Re: Autovacuum Improvements
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-12-19 21:54:58 Re: admin82.sql

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-19 21:57:24 Re: Autovacuum Improvements
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-12-19 21:51:39 Re: Autovacuum Improvements