From: | Marco Serantoni <m(dot)serantoni(at)caltanet(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Database Auditing |
Date: | 2006-10-12 07:05:04 |
Message-ID: | 452DE920.9080401@caltanet.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
>> I'm evaluating of use postgresql but for local law requirements is
>> needed for the access of some kind of data (sensitive) a log of the
>> accesses (Auditing) is a feature available in many databases but i've
>> seen that lacks in PostgreSQL, there are already plans to implement it
>> or patches already submitted ?
>> If not both could someone give me some hints on how do it
> we can probably come up with something. can you please give specific
> requirements about what type of information you have to keep track of?
username, date and statement executed and optionally the IP.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-10-12 08:49:42 | Re: UTF-8 |
Previous Message | Chris Mair | 2006-10-12 06:16:37 | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2006-10-12 07:51:11 | Re: Patch for Win32 blocking problem |
Previous Message | Florian Weimer | 2006-10-12 06:34:45 | Re: Index Tuning Features |