From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.3 Development Cycle |
Date: | 2006-09-22 16:55:56 |
Message-ID: | 4514159C.7080604@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Dunstan wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> This will obviously be a short development cycle which will allow us to
>> get some of the features that just missed 8.2 out of the door, as well
>> as giving us the opportunity to try releasing before the summer (for
>> those in the northern hemisphere) rather than after.
>
> Joshua's original mail suggested that only certain features would go in.
> Is that still on the cards, or will other features be considered if
> they're ready?
>
> I'm obviously thinking of enums which was ready (for review at least) a
> few weeks ago, but has probably bitrotted slightly since then given the
> number of patches that have landed in the tree. I intended to brush it
> up as soon as the 8.3 tree was open and resubmit it. Will that be a
> waste of time?
>
AFAIK, we aren't doing anything like that, and it would be quite unfair
if we did.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2006-09-22 16:56:00 | Re: -HEAD planner issue wrt hash_joins on dbt3 ? |
Previous Message | J-Pro | 2006-09-22 16:55:16 | silent install: silent error (even using the manual) |