Re: vista

From: Geoffrey <esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vista
Date: 2006-09-20 11:46:45
Message-ID: 45112A25.7070800@3times25.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Andrew Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 10:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Naz Gassiep <naz(at)mira(dot)net> writes:
>>> For something like Vista
>>> compatibility, if you want to be taken seriously by anyone who uses
>>> Windows (hands up anyone who knows a Windows user), "scratch your own
>>> itch" is not really going to cut it, IMHO.
>> I was responding to someone who is obviously a Windows beta tester and
>> therefore presumably has more clue than the average Windows-oid ---
>> asking for a patch didn't seem unreasonable. But for arguments like the
>> above, I will happily say "apparently you've confused me with someone
>> who gives a damn about Windows".
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>
>
> Where can I buy a little plastic statue of Tom Lane for my dashboard?

You mean the one with the hula skirt?

--
Until later, Geoffrey

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin

In response to

  • Re: vista at 2006-09-20 10:02:48 from Andrew Kelly

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias.Pitzl 2006-09-20 12:34:34 Strange database corruption with PostgreSQL 7.4.x on Debian Sarge
Previous Message Andrew Kelly 2006-09-20 10:02:48 Re: vista

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-20 11:54:23 Re: Release notes
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2006-09-20 11:28:42 Re: pg_upgrade: downgradebility