Re: Lock partitions

From: Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lock partitions
Date: 2006-09-14 18:13:33
Message-ID: 45099BCD.1040402@osdl.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> writes:
>> Sorry for the delay but looks like there's some data coming in. It also
>> looks like my kit is starting to be a little dated. My stored libpq
>> calls are failing. I'm getting this message:
>
>> ERROR: record type has not been registered
>
> This is a server-side failure --- could we see how order_status()
> is defined? What PG version are you testing exactly?

I took pgsqsl snapshot from cvs on Sept 11. Due to the length of the
file that order_status() is in and of order_status() itself, here's is a
url for the file in the svn repository. order_status() is defined
starting on line 710:

http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/osdldbt/trunk/dbt2/storedproc/pgsql/c/funcs.c?view=markup

Thanks,
Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-14 18:16:09 Re: Mid cycle release?
Previous Message AgentM 2006-09-14 18:12:30 Re: New version of money type