Re: Buildfarm vs. Linux Distro classification

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Buildfarm vs. Linux Distro classification
Date: 2006-09-11 18:21:02
Message-ID: 4505A90E.8070501@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>
>> well I think Andrew is more scared of having multiple boxes on the
>> buildfarm all stating to be "Debian testing" or "Debian unstable" but
>> without much information on how regulary those boxes are actually synced
>> to those moving/changing branches and causing discussions on "why is it
>> suddenly failung on that box but not on the other".
>
> It might make sense to attach the version information (in this case,
> gcc, glibc, kernel versions) to each particular test run, rather than to
> each particular farm member.

that is a good idea generally but that information might not be
available in a portable way on all platforms (and even than we might
want to have version information on things/libs like readline,zlib,ldap,
too) ...

Stefan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-11 18:25:18 Re: Fixed length data types issue
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-09-11 18:17:58 Re: Buildfarm vs. Linux Distro classification