Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)

From: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)is(dot)rice(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Date: 2006-08-17 15:36:58
Message-ID: 44E48D1A.6040108@wildenhain.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus schrieb:
> Greg,
>
>> In short, it's just a tool to solve a problem we actually have (having a
>> convenient archive of data about current and past bugs) without inventing
>> problems to solve with extra process that we aren't already doing
>> anyways.
>>
>> RT can be set up similarly but I'm not sure how much work it would
>> take to
>> make it as seamless. Debbugs has the advantage of working that way
>> pretty much
>> out of the box.
>
> Debbugs would be good too. I'll quiz the Debian folks here at the
> conference about what issues there are with the system.
>
> FWIW, MySQL is pretty proud of their bug tracker, and Marten offered to
> open source it for us. ;-)

What is wrong with for example trac? (trac.edgewall.com) which actually
runs on postgres just fine...

Regards
Tino

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2006-08-17 15:50:24 Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum maintenance window (was Re: Adjust autovacuum
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-08-17 15:30:01 Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)