Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Date: 2012-09-04 04:16:42
Message-ID: 4405.1346732202@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I tend to agree. Another idea here might be to stick with Tom's
> original idea of making it a connection parameter, but have it be
> turned off by default. In other words, if an application wants to
> allow those parameters to be used, it would need to do
> PQenableStartServer() first. If it doesn't, those connection
> parameters will be rejected.

Hm, that might work.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-09-04 04:20:59 Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-09-04 04:16:39 Re: pg_upgrade del/rmdir path fix