Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Date: 2006-01-10 00:01:37
Message-ID: 43C2F961.8000004@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>I can put it in the Win32 section of the TODO list. If we have
>something not working on Win32, I would like to document it.
>
>Is it:
> plperl changes the locale in Win32?
>
>
>

As long as the locale is consistent I think we're OK (is that right, Tom?)

Would that mean not using any of initdb's locale settings?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2006-01-10 00:41:17 Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-01-09 23:49:59 Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)