Re: Improving performance on multicolumn query

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Jan Kesten <jan(dot)kesten(at)web(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Improving performance on multicolumn query
Date: 2005-11-09 13:19:33
Message-ID: 4371F765.1050209@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> transfer=> explain analyse SELECT * FROM test WHERE test_a=9091150001
> AND test_b=1 AND test_c=2 AND test_d=0 AND test_e=0;
>
> Index Scan using test_idx on test (cost=0.00..50.27 rows=1 width=1891)
> (actual time=0.161..0.167 rows=1 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (test_a = 9091150001::bigint)
> Filter: ((test_b = 1) AND (test_c = 2) AND (test_d = 0) AND (test_e 0))
>
> So, what to do to speed things up? If I understand correctly this
> output, the planner uses my index (test_idx is the same as test_pkey
> created along with the table), but only for the first column.

Hi Jan,

If you're using 7.4.x then the planner can't use the index for unquoted
bigints. Try this:

SELECT * FROM test WHERE test_a='9091150001' AND test_b='1' AND
test_c=''2 AND test_d='0' AND test_e='0';

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charlie Savage 2005-11-09 17:13:46 Re: Sort performance on large tables
Previous Message Steinar H. Gunderson 2005-11-09 13:00:17 Re: Improving performance on multicolumn query