Re: Oracle buys Innobase

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle buys Innobase
Date: 2005-10-08 17:42:26
Message-ID: 43480502.3020304@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

On 10/8/2005 12:13 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Jan Wieck wrote:
>> To have a really good position when talking to Oracle, MySQL will need
>> to brush up on the BDB support, and that pretty quick.
>
> What about the patents InnoDB might hold? It would be easier to enforce
> a patent based on the fact that they are using code actually developed
> by the patent holder.

That too.

What strikes me a little odd is how brief the responses from the MySQL
side are. Marten Mickos welcomes them, does some 2 sentence handwaving
about licensing and the glorious freedom of open source, and then the
rest of the statement is the usual blah blah about MySQL that you find
in every other press release.

It almost seems as if MySQL wasn't exactly prepared for this deal to
come through - or worse, that they are surprised about it. Although I
can't believe they wouldn't have known about it in advance.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message CSN 2005-10-08 18:04:24 Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-08 16:13:10 Re: Oracle buys Innobase

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-10-08 17:42:33 Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-08 16:13:10 Re: Oracle buys Innobase