Re: User's exception plpgsql

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: User's exception plpgsql
Date: 2005-07-04 07:07:47
Message-ID: 42C8E043.1010303@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Per small recent discussion I corrected patch user's exception.

I'll review and apply this in the next day or so.

> Next ToDo (needs discussion):
> + Optional message in raise stmt for user's or system exception
> raise exception division_by_zero;
> + Possibility rethrown exception
> raise;

Both sound pretty reasonable to me.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2005-07-04 07:24:59 Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-07-04 06:59:58 Re: [PATCH] pgcrypto: pgp_encrypt (v2)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2005-07-04 07:24:59 Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-07-04 06:59:58 Re: [PATCH] pgcrypto: pgp_encrypt (v2)