Re: LGPL

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>, John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LGPL
Date: 2005-06-15 13:19:22
Message-ID: 42B02ADA.4070806@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>Maybe LGPL is OK, but I think we will try to avoid a dependency on LGPL
>code if we can help it.
>
>
>

License issues aside, should we not be trying to avoid adding
dependencies on third party libraries, especially those that are not
standard on most operating systems? Also bear in mind that any required
library would need to be supported on Windows as well as on *nix.

cheers

andrew

In response to

  • Re: LGPL at 2005-06-15 12:51:07 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

  • Re: LGPL at 2005-06-15 13:26:20 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-15 13:26:20 Re: LGPL
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-06-15 13:05:40 Re: LGPL