| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk, andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: The Contrib Roundup (long) |
| Date: | 2005-06-13 12:16:50 |
| Message-ID: | 42AD7932.7060004@Yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/12/2005 8:03 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Couldn't behaviour of REINDEX DATABASE not take that into account, and
> 'skip' the system indices if not superuser?
Silently doing something other than what the user requested ... I don't
think this is the right way to become the most popular open source
database in the world.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2005-06-13 12:34:26 | Re: The Contrib Roundup (long) |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-06-13 12:10:51 | Re: proposed TODO: non-locking CREATE INDEX / REINDEX |