| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | adnandursun(at)asrinbilisim(dot)com(dot)tr |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| Date: | 2005-05-02 02:05:45 |
| Message-ID: | 42758AF9.5060705@samurai.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
adnandursun(at)asrinbilisim(dot)com(dot)tr wrote:
> statement_timeout is not a solution if many processes are
> waiting the resource.
Why not?
I think the only problem with using statement_timeout for this purpose
is that the client connection might die during a long-running
transaction at a point when no statement is currently executing. Tom's
suggested transaction_timeout would be a reasonable way to fix this.
Adnan, if you think this is such a significant problem (I can't say that
I agree), I'd encourage you to submit a patch.
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2005-05-02 03:58:50 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-05-02 01:48:29 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2005-05-02 03:58:50 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-02 01:56:51 | Re: Problem with Create Domain example |