Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST
Date: 2010-12-17 19:31:41
Message-ID: 4267.1292614301@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Another possibly-useful thing about mandating a full page header for
> every page is that it might give us a way of avoiding unnecessary full
> page writes. As I wrote previously:

Could we do that via a bufmgr status bit, instead? Heikki's idea has
the merit that it actually reduces bufmgr's knowledge of page headers,
rather than increasing it (since a buffer marked UNLOGGED would need
no assumptions at all about its content).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-12-17 19:32:20 Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-12-17 19:25:24 Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST