John Burger wrote:
>>> If it were me, and someone proposed a model where two-way replication
>>> was needed, I would tell them to rethink their model. It's broken.
>>
>>
>> I would respectfully disagree that the requirement for two-way
>> replication
>> indicates a broken design.
>
>
> I agree with your disagreement. This design is present in lots of
> non-RDB systems - CVS, IMAP, PDA syncing, etc. It's clearly more
> complicated, but can be made to work, and has been many times. I
> don't see anything about databases in general, or Postgres
> specifically, that indicates it's a bad idea.
>
> - John D. Burger
> MITRE
>
Yes, we use it successfully with the SQL Server edition of our product.
Does anyone know if this is available with Postgre?
Caleb