Re: Re: [Pg-migrator-general] Composite types break pg_migrated tables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jeff <threshar(at)threshar(dot)is-a-geek(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [Pg-migrator-general] Composite types break pg_migrated tables
Date: 2009-08-06 00:05:25
Message-ID: 4245.1249517125@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm ... has anyone tested pg_migrator using either composite types or
>> arrays of user-defined types? Both of them have got user-defined-type
>> OIDs in on-disk data, now that I think about it. For that matter, enums
>> are going to be a problem too.

> Don't arrays have embedded element OIDs too?

Er, that's what I said. It looks nasty :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-08-06 01:08:08 Re: Alpha Releases: Docs?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-08-06 00:01:56 Re: Re: [Pg-migrator-general] Composite types break pg_migrated tables