Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql

From: Miroslav Šulc <miroslav(dot)sulc(at)startnet(dot)cz>
To: Rick Schumeyer <rschumeyer(at)ieee(dot)org>
Cc: 'PgSql General' <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql
Date: 2005-03-14 12:18:37
Message-ID: 4235811D.4080100@startnet.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Rick,

the work you are doing is important (at least I think so).

From my experience PosgreSQL performance is also very slow in case
there are several LEFT JOINs and there are varchar() fields. You can see
an example in archive where my problem is described (Subject: "How to
read query plan"). There is a patch that partially solves this problem
(as Tom Lane mentioned) but it is not in the latest PostgreSQL release.

I will work on improving of the design of tables that I have problem
with to see if there will be any significant speed improvements. Maybe
you could use some of my results for some of your tests then.

Miroslav

Rick Schumeyer wrote:

>Below are some PRELIMINARY results in comparing the performance of pgsql and
>mysql.
>
>...
>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
miroslav.sulc.vcf text/x-vcard 387 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sim Zacks 2005-03-14 12:37:00 plpython function problem workaround
Previous Message Net Virtual Mailing Lists 2005-03-14 12:11:45 Re: Peculiar performance observation....