From: | Geoffrey <esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "'Pgsql-General(at)Postgresql(dot)Org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Scheduler in Postgres |
Date: | 2004-12-16 15:15:31 |
Message-ID: | 41C1A693.2090400@3times25.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Csaba Nagy wrote:
> No doubt about this, there are a lot of features which are way more
> important, but this was not the point at all.
>
> The question was if there is any advantage of having it in the DB, and
> the answer is: yes there is some advantage. It's a totally different
> problem how important it is - there are many ways to handle scheduled
> processes.
Sure, and there's an advantage to traveling the speed of light, but
you've got to set your priorities.
> I would myself vote with leaving it out in favor of other features
Agreed.
--
Until later, Geoffrey
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2004-12-16 15:17:00 | Re: What HW / OS is recommeded |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-12-16 14:51:56 | Re: 7.1.3: dataloss: FATAL 2: XLogFlush: request is not satisfied |