Re: Scheduler in Postgres

From: Geoffrey <esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net>
To: "'Pgsql-General(at)Postgresql(dot)Org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Scheduler in Postgres
Date: 2004-12-16 15:15:31
Message-ID: 41C1A693.2090400@3times25.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Csaba Nagy wrote:
> No doubt about this, there are a lot of features which are way more
> important, but this was not the point at all.
>
> The question was if there is any advantage of having it in the DB, and
> the answer is: yes there is some advantage. It's a totally different
> problem how important it is - there are many ways to handle scheduled
> processes.

Sure, and there's an advantage to traveling the speed of light, but
you've got to set your priorities.

> I would myself vote with leaving it out in favor of other features

Agreed.

--
Until later, Geoffrey

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2004-12-16 15:17:00 Re: What HW / OS is recommeded
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-12-16 14:51:56 Re: 7.1.3: dataloss: FATAL 2: XLogFlush: request is not satisfied