From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |
Date: | 2004-11-05 17:45:17 |
Message-ID: | 418BBC2D.4060709@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
>
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>
>>> I'm certainly open to considering subversion, although I have a
>>> certain traumatic experience with it that may or may not be related
>>> to the BDB backend that it uses.
>>>
>>> I think for a start it would be nice if pgfoundry could optionally
>>> offer subversion (and/or arch) for source control, so that some
>>> developer groups and also our system administrators could get some
>>> experience with it.
>>
>>
>> I good very start point is see if cvs2svn can handle the postgresql
>> CVS without
>> errors.
>
>
> I tried that yesterday out of curiosity. It had problems with 3 files
> which I removed manually:
>
> /pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/ApachePg.pl,v
> /pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.newstyle,v
> /pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.oldstyle.pl,v
>
> Otherwise, no problems.
>
> Interestingly, the subversion repository is 585MB, and the CVS
> repository is only 260MB, so apparently Subversion is not very good at
> compressing the repository. Not that it matters, though.
>
Subversion, I believe uses SleepycatDb (eg Db4). Thus it isn't flat
files like CVS.
>
> I also agree with Andrew's observation that it's really up to the
> committers since they are the ones that have to work with whatever
> system we have.
>
> I like subversion very much, but one thing that troubles me a bit is
> the number of extra libraries required to compile and run it. Also, is
> there pre-compiled binaries for all the platforms that PostgreSQL
> supports?
Doubtful. Also there are known issues with Subversion on >FC1 if you are
running newer versions of it. You have to compile specially with
--without-posix-mutexes (I think that was the flag).
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> - Heikki
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 285 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-11-05 17:58:40 | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-11-05 17:39:02 | Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-11-05 17:58:40 | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2004-11-05 17:38:12 | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |