Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Date: 2004-11-05 15:44:18
Message-ID: 418B9FD2.2090607@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Freitag, 5. November 2004 14:13 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
>
>>I'll repeat an observation I made (more or less) last time we had this
>>discussion: the loudest voice in it belongs to those who actually use
>>the repository most. When Tom or Bruce or Peter (for example) tell us we
>>need to change I'll take lots more notice.
>
>
> I'm certainly open to considering subversion, although I have a certain
> traumatic experience with it that may or may not be related to the BDB
> backend that it uses.
>
> I think for a start it would be nice if pgfoundry could optionally offer
> subversion (and/or arch) for source control, so that some developer groups
> and also our system administrators could get some experience with it.

I good very start point is see if cvs2svn can handle the postgresql CVS without
errors.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-11-05 15:46:38 Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Previous Message Joachim Wieland 2004-11-05 15:28:38 Documentation on PITR still scarce

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-11-05 15:46:38 Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-11-05 15:22:55 Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die