| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Katsaros Kwn/nos <ntinos(at)aueb(dot)gr> |
| Cc: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Networking feature for postgresql... |
| Date: | 2004-10-16 16:48:47 |
| Message-ID: | 417150EF.5030507@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Katsaros Kwn/nos wrote:
> Having taken a look at the dblink code I have some questions:
>
ISTM that you might start with dblink_record() and modify it to suit
using SPI and asynchronous libpq calls. See:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/libpq-async.html
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ken Tozier | 2004-10-16 17:50:37 | Newbie table definition question |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-10-16 16:48:36 | Re: pgsql cvs |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-16 16:54:17 | Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-16 16:20:19 | Re: Why we still see some reports of "could not access |