Re: COPY not handling BLOBs

From: David Rysdam <drysdam(at)ll(dot)mit(dot)edu>
To:
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COPY not handling BLOBs
Date: 2004-08-04 18:49:03
Message-ID: 41112F9F.2030709@ll.mit.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:

>David Rysdam <drysdam(at)ll(dot)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>
>
>>Doug McNaught wrote:
>>
>>
>>>You might consider using "bytea" instead of large objects, unless you
>>>need the lo_read()/lo_seek() API in your client app... I'm not
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>bytea will only go up to "several thousand bytes" according to the
>>docs.
>>
>>
>
>[ raises eyebrow... ] According to *what* docs?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>
>
I was using the general search feature and found something like that. I
only just now noticed that you can choose a doc version and search
within only that.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2004-08-04 19:40:01 Re: Simplfied Bytea input/output?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-04 18:43:40 Re: COPY not handling BLOBs