Re: Performance Bottleneck

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Martin Foster <martin(at)ethereal-realms(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance Bottleneck
Date: 2004-08-03 18:52:28
Message-ID: 410FDEEC.90901@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hello,

It sounds to me like you are IO bound. 2x120GB hard drives just isn't
going to cut it with that many connections (as a general rule). Are you
swapping ?

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

Martin Foster wrote:
> I run a Perl/CGI driven website that makes extensive use of PostgreSQL
> (7.4.3) for everything from user information to formatting and display
> of specific sections of the site. The server itself, is a dual
> processor AMD Opteron 1.4Ghz w/ 2GB Ram and 2 x 120GB hard drives
> mirrored for redundancy running under FreeBSD 5.2.1 (AMD64).
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment Content-Type Size
jd.vcf text/x-vcard 640 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-08-04 01:32:53 Re: NOT IN query takes forever
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-08-03 18:41:23 Re: Performance Bottleneck