Re: pg_dump bug fixing

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump bug fixing
Date: 2004-08-03 02:04:39
Message-ID: 410EF2B7.9050309@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>AFAICS that happens only if you've specified the -c (--clean) option.
>>>Hence, I don't think it's a bug.
>
>
>>Nope, happens even if you don't pass --clean.
>
>
> Not in CVS tip ... but you're right, older versions did act that way.
> Looks like someone addressed this already.

Yeah, was one of my fixes.

Should we change it to use DROP USER commands anyway?

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-03 02:08:00 Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-08-03 02:03:48 Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option