| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
| Date: | 2004-05-18 01:02:05 |
| Message-ID: | 40A9608D.6090604@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> The much I am for pulling stuff that does not belong into core, doing
> it just for the fun of cleaning up or trimming doesn't do. One of the
> major functions of CVS is that one can tag collections of revisions
> that together build a release, a "known to be working snapshot of file
> revisions". If we completely lose the ability to tell what version of
> what PL, client interface or extension works with what version of the
> backend, we're losing some important detail here.
>
Also, one of the best features of PostgreSQL is that you can, at will
write a procedure in just about anything... It seems that keeping at least
the most popular pl implementations would be an important step.
]
>
> Jan
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-05-18 01:18:35 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2004-05-18 00:56:00 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |