From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Usability, MySQL, Postgresql.org, gborg, contrib, |
Date: | 2004-05-07 18:06:55 |
Message-ID: | 409BD03F.2090801@bigfoot.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>> plpgsql is more close to postgres then plPython or plPerl, and after
>> all is nearest SQL then plPtyhton or plPerl so a DBA find it more
>> confortable then others languages.
>
>
> DBA probably... programmer? Doubtful. The majority of people that I run
> into that are using PostgreSQL are not DBA's. They are programmers
> trying to do it a better way. Providing plPerl or plPython etc... allows
> them to stay in a native and productive environment.
True, but a good DBA have to check each single store procedure and view that
other programmers write, see tuning techics that programmers are not aware of
( see select max(id) from foo; optimized with a order by + limit 1 ).
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-05-07 18:34:25 | Re: COPY command - CSV files |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-05-07 17:39:56 | Re: Usability, MySQL, Postgresql.org, gborg, contrib, |