Re: Simple join optimized badly?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, "Craig A(dot) James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Simple join optimized badly?
Date: 2006-10-09 17:41:42
Message-ID: 4094.1160415702@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Unfortunately, EDB's solution is likely to be Oracle-based, which is
> liable to fall into the trap of "not good enough."

I'd be a bit worried about Oracle patents as well...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2006-10-09 18:07:29 Re: Simple join optimized badly?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-10-09 17:12:43 Re: Simple join optimized badly?