Re: Maintenance Policy?

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Maintenance Policy?
Date: 2009-07-13 00:04:56
Message-ID: 407d949e0907121704g33bc91bcpdea58738b289aa87@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Josh Berkus<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Well, what I'm really concerned about is letting people know that we expect
> to *stop* providing update versions after 5 years.

That seems like a reasonable thing to say and you've just said it more
simply than any of your previous proposals. I suggest you just go with
the above.

> Every year, this seems to take some people by surprise.

For what it's worth I find it hard to believe anyone's really
surprised by this. Nearly all other open source projects stop
supporting old branches as soon as there's a newer branch is released.

--
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2009-07-13 00:51:28 Re: Maintenance Policy?
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-07-13 00:02:04 Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/lite rev.2163