From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_ctl |
Date: | 2004-03-24 16:39:23 |
Message-ID: | 4061B9BB.9090703@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>Are we now in a state where it would make sense to look at doing pg_ctl
>>in C?
>>
>>
>
>Why bother? I should think that Windows users want to run PG as a service.
>
>
Not unreasonable. Maybe someone who uses/distributes a commercial
Windows version can inform us about usage patterns. If that's what we
decide we should remove this from the Win32 page:
. Create C version of pg_ctl?
And while on the subject of that page, this issue should now be fixed
with the listen_addresses patch (which I hope someone can verify):
Postmaster must be started with -i flag, or with tcpip_socket = true in
postgresql.conf, else the postmaster will fail to start and issue the
following error:
|LOG: select() failed in postmaster: No such file or directory
cheers
andrew
|
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-03-24 16:56:59 | Re: pg_ctl |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-24 16:15:08 | Re: pg_ctl |