Re: Old binary packages.

From: "V i s h a l Kashyap (at) [Sai Hertz And Control Systems]" <sank89(at)sancharnet(dot)in>
To: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Old binary packages.
Date: 2004-01-20 17:13:50
Message-ID: 400D61CE.5060209@sancharnet.in
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Lamar Owen ,

>Since we are keeping
>all source releases (although I would question that, since we use CVS),
>keeping all the binaries around is just a space waster, IMHO.
>
>Comments?
>
>
Keeping 7.X and then 7.X.y where y is the last minor version for 7.X is
fine
As you would have noticed from the [general] list that people are still
stuck to 7.2 branch
So IMO keeping 7.2 with as said (7.X.y) is Okay
but please dont take of 7.3 > till 7.4
Because PostgreSQL is the primary and only source for the distribution
and if for any reason some one need old version where will he/she go?

--
Regards,
Vishal Kashyap

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
I Know you believe my words so logon to Jabber.org
and add vishalkashyap(at)jabber(dot)org to your roster.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
I am usually called as Vishal Kashyap
but my Girl friend calls me as Vishal CASH UP.
This is because others know me because of my generosity
and my Girlfriend knows me because of my CASH.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-01-20 18:36:16 Re: Old binary packages.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-01-20 17:07:42 Re: PostGIS dropgeometrycolumn function (Was: Re: [7.4] "permissions problem" with pl/pgsql function )