From: | db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org |
---|---|
To: | "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: invalidly encoded strings |
Date: | 2007-09-10 08:45:59 |
Message-ID: | 40010.192.121.104.48.1189413959.squirrel@zigo.dhs.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
>>> I think the concern is when they use only one slash, like:
>>> E'\377\000\377'::bytea
>>> which, as I mentioned before, is not correct anyway.
>
> Wait, why would this be wrong? How would you enter the three byte bytea of
> consisting of those three bytes described above?
Either as
E'\\377\\000\\377'
or
'\377\000\377'
/Dennis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jens-Wolfhard Schicke | 2007-09-10 08:56:52 | Re: Hash index todo list item |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-09-10 08:04:54 | Re: invalidly encoded strings |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-09-10 09:57:05 | Re: HOT patch - version 15 |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-09-10 08:17:18 | Re: HOT patch - version 15 |