Re: Streaming Replication and archiving

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming Replication and archiving
Date: 2010-01-21 02:54:54
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb1001201854i6974951fyf9189a349d4dda30@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Presumably, however, if the slave falls sufficiently behind and there
> are no archive logs, then the slave would not be able to resynch with
> the master, no?

In that case, we would need to make a fresh backup of the primary,
and start the standby from that data.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-01-21 03:35:19 Re: Red-black tree for GIN
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-01-21 02:51:32 Re: attoptions