| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Architecture of walreceiver (Streaming Replication) |
| Date: | 2009-11-04 03:17:51 |
| Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb0911031917l338863a8vf7b6962c1c412640@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> wrt. synchronous replication, if someone else has the cycles to look at
> it, that would be great. I got stuck on the postmaster-process or not
> question Fujii raised again now, not being able to decide.
What is your worry about the postmaster-subprocess walreceiver?
One of those is that the startup process would become stuck because
of failure of launching of walreceiver, and I have addressed that.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/msg02003.php
If you have another worry, I'll address that.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2009-11-04 04:06:53 | Re: DISTINCT ON |
| Previous Message | Emmanuel Cecchet | 2009-11-04 03:17:06 | DISTINCT ON |