Re: Non-blocking communication between a frontend and a backend (pqcomm)

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Non-blocking communication between a frontend and a backend (pqcomm)
Date: 2009-07-27 07:56:06
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0907270056x3d26b8dev3e8c012b325eeb9e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> OK, I agree, I can't see what this is for either from the code that is
> here.  I think I read a little more meaning into the title of the
> patch than was actually there.  It seems like the appropriate thing to
> do is mark this returned with feedback, so I'm going to go do that.

OK. I'll change and resubmit the patch with Synch Rep which uses it
in the next CommitFest.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-07-27 08:17:58 Re: autogenerating headers & bki stuff
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2009-07-27 07:13:27 Re: Review: support for multiplexing SIGUSR1