Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rick Gigger <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07
Date: 2009-07-17 09:37:01
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0907170237p5d34176k5be97adcc7e3d6d7@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Greg Stark<gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> Only the sysadmin is actually going to know which makes more sense.
> Unless we start tieing WAL parameters to the database size or
> something like that.

Agreed. And, if a user doesn't want to make a new base backup because
of a large database, s/he can manually copy the archived WAL files to the
standby before starting it, and make it use them for its recovery.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikhil Sontakke 2009-07-17 09:54:55 Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2009-07-17 09:15:11 Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07