Re: Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5?

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5?
Date: 2009-06-25 13:03:33
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0906250603m6362498eq5cb143aa54310806@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Is there any reason not to remove the include directory in PG_CPPFLAGS
> as well? Seems it is equally unused...

No. I agree to remove PG_CPPFLAGS.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2009-06-25 13:09:47 Re: Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5?
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-06-25 12:09:20 Re: Resolving pg_standby -l