Re: Multiplexing SUGUSR1

From: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multiplexing SUGUSR1
Date: 2008-12-11 01:55:37
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0812101755g3e380b8v2dd1365cfd264d69@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

> My version doesn't have support for auxiliary processes. Does the
> synchronous replication patch need that?

Yes, the background writer also generates the WAL like a backend,
so it has to be able to communicate with walsender.

> On closer look, I don't see anything setting ProcSignalData.pid field. Which
> make me believe that the patch can't possibly work.

Ooops! My patch has some bugs :(
I will update the patch based on yours, and add the support for auxiliary
processes into it.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2008-12-11 02:23:08 Re: Multiplexing SUGUSR1
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2008-12-11 01:29:21 Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268)